World Builder: Short Film

15 03 2009

Oh hell.  This had me bawling like a small child for a decent five minutes.  I seem to get increasingly more sappy as I get older, dammit.  Something -must- be done.  To quote the Lady Macbeth:  ”Come you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here, and fill me from the crown to the toe top-full of direst cruelty!  Make thick my blood and stop up the access and passage to remorse that no compunctious visitings of nature shake my fell purpose, nor keep pace between the effect and it!”

Anyway, here is a really beautiful short film by Bruce Bryant, found via Nathan Bradsford.  Nathan commented on his blog that he felt it captured what it was like to be a writer, and I couldn’t agree more.  World Builder captured exactly the empty, lonely feeling of starting a fresh scene.  So very moving.

The film is an awesome piece and reminds me very much of a story my boy-o wrote for me back in the day when we first started dating.  Also, I seriously want technology like this.

~ Darcy





Who was not watching the Watchmen?

7 03 2009

watchmenMe, because I’m in graduate school hell right now. Grrrr.

Anyway, I09 reports that Watchmen pulled in $25.1 million on it’s first day so I assume a number of you did make it out to the theaters. Surprisingly though, when looking for reactions to the movie the blogosphere seems to be unusually quiet and scattered on the subject. MTV’s article pretty much sums it up, Watchmen Reviews Are In: Everyone Disagree’s! No one camp seems to be larger than the other.

Over on Rotten Tomatoes the movie has only a 65% rating. The comments are pretty well mixed up across the entire spectrum, and as always when it comes to fan movies and Rotten Tomatoes hilarity ensues.

However, most of the blogs I’ve read have been reasonably favorable. I haven’t found anyone gushing over the movie, but the general feeling is that Snyder did a -decent- job of adapting the movie. They acknowledge that the movie is flawed, but let’s face it, we all knew it couldn’t be perfect. Watchmen is so dense with supplementary material and abstract nuances that somethings were bound to be lost in translation.

Not having seen the movie yet myself, there isn’t much more -I- can say on the matter (one more week!) but here are a few sites that already have posts up about the movie. Once again though I’m quite surprised that the discussions have not been more active. If any of you bloggers are talking about this on your own sites, drop off a link in the comments here. I’d love to hear what you thought about Watchmen.

Tor.com

Suvudu

ComicMix

Nerdage

/End of Line

~ Darcy





Coraline in 3D!!!

24 02 2009

Let me start by saying, let’s all pretend that I have already posted the coming review of Audrey, Wait! by Robin Benway. But for now I’m going to be a good little blogger and review the new movie Coraline like Darcy asked me to.

To start off with let me say I enjoyed both the book and the movie Coraline. Neil Gaiman is pretty damn brilliant at what he does. I did however have some issues with the movie which I didn’t have with the book. I also had a quip with the book that I didn’t have with the movie. I’m going to try to keep this review as spoiler free as possible, but I also have to assume that if you’re reading this you have some familiarity with the story. In a nutshell it’s about Coraline, a little girl who finds a bricked off door in her apartment. One night the door opens to a magical world of awesome that happens to have a monster that steals her parents and Coraline must use all her cunning (and a cat) to get them back.

The only thing I found lacking with the book was the description of the other world. I got the feeling it was supposed to be this amazing world of wonder and no child but Coraline would ever want to leave at first. But I felt the story left things a little too up to my imagination, I didn’t feel like it was a world I would have had trouble leaving. Maybe as most of my pleasure reading is done on the subway, my imagination hat wasn’t as on as it should have been. That said I was really looking forward to seeing how amazing the other world would look onscreen. I was not disappointed. The other world was everything I could have hoped for and more. The 3D effects were as spectacular as I wanted and they didn’t feel forced. With other 3D movies I’ve seen it feels like the animators are just trying to see how much stuff they can get away with throwing at the screen, which is fine in small doses but a full feature length movie could be a little much. That’s not the case with Coraline, it promises a modern wonderland and it delivers.

On to my movie gripes. I understand that changes must be made from book to movie. Things added and removed, when it’s done well it’s magic when it’s not it’s well, crap. My main problem with the movie which irked me from the first hint of it in the commercial was the inclusion of Wybie, short for Wybourn. First of all why include a comment about his name sounding like why-born and never going anywhere with it? The tome of knowledge that is Wikipedia says he was added so that it wouldn’t just be Coraline talking to herself and to me that’s just not a good enough reason. He’s annoying and adds nothing to the story. Worst of all he detracts form Coraline as a character. While it’s still Coraline who saves her parents and the other children from the evil other mother, it’s Wybie that finally does her in. Indulge me a moment dear readers as I jump up on my feminist soapbox. One of the things I loved loved loved about Coraline was that she was a strong female child character and we don’t have enough of them. She wasn’t a 2D stereotype of a cheerleader or a girl that just wants to be some pretty pretty princess. She’s got a big problem and she solves it on her own. But in the movie she needs a little boy. That’s probably not the intention but that’s how it seems. If they needed to add this extra character why couldn’t it have been a girl? The cat is a boy, can’t the poofy extra be a girl? I’m not a person who believes there’s some grand machismo council trying to get women back in the kitchen. However I do think that when you’re producing something for kids you should be aware of the message you’re sending. There’s a lot of tripe out there for girls, and when a literary god like Gaiman writes us a great female character don’t mess it up by adding some sniveling little boy to literally ride in on his white bike (ok it wasn’t white but still) to save the day.

Aside from that there were a few moments that dragged a little, some things went on longer than they needed too but not in a Return of the King eighteen freaking endings kind of way. In terms of acting the voices were great. I’m pretty much in awe of Dakota Fanning in general but I also really loved Keith David as the Cat. I wish some of the warnings the mice gave in the book were included in the movie. The mice were absolutely adorable, seriously if they make toy mice I would buy them.

I feel like the movie dumbed down the creepy aspect of the book, and part of that again had to do with wybie. To me as a child there would have been nothing as frightening as my parents disappearing, being alone with a monster. That’s primal nightmare stuff right there. But the movie has to span a larger audience than the book so it has to be a tinge less terrifying so that the five year old brother of the nine year old girl in the audience won’t be scared for life. While watching it we did have the awesome experience of having one small child yell “I want to go home now!” after a particularly spine tingling scene, which I think made every adult in the audience laugh. This is one of those movies where parents really need to know their kids before they walk in. If your child laughs at the monster in the closet, throw the glasses on and enjoy the show, if he’s kind of squeamish of say spiders this is NOT the movie for him.

To wrap up a rather long post, in general I feel bad telling anyone to spend the ridiculous amount of money that tickets cost these days but if you are going to splurge I recommend Coraline. Unless you’re a person who can not separate the book from the movie I’d say it’s fairly likely that you will enjoy yourself.

~ Editorial Assassin





I can haz Inkheart plz?

19 01 2009

So I finished two kindle books  on my currently-reading-list in the past few days.  (At any one time I’ll be reading five books.  I have book ADD.)  So I thought to reward myself by buying a new book for the kindle.  With Inkheart just five days away, it seemed perfect.  I want to see the movie; however, I should be a good little bookworm and read the book first.  The publisher will surely have put out an e-book format with the movie just around the corner ….

“WHAAAAA!?  What do you mean ‘Inkheart’ does not match any items in: ‘Kindle Store’?”

I did not see that coming.  I really didn’t.  Now that the series is over, demand for these books is only going slow down after the movies’ release.  This was the last chance to capitalize on the current hype in electronic sales.  Electronic sales right now make up only a small contribution to the bottom line for most publishers so yeah, maybe it is just not that important.  But doesn’t every little bit help?  I don’t know what the publisher was waiting for unless there was a contractual problem with the digital rights.  Since Inkheart is originally a german book, perhaps Scholastic didn’t get english electronic rights.  

Who knows, but no new book for me.  Blargh.

/End of Line

~ Darcy





Let the countdown resume.

18 01 2009

Warner Brothers and Fox have finally agreed to terms in the Watchmen legal dispute, thank the light.  

Under the agreement Fox will not be co-distributor of the film, but they are getting a sizable payoff, 8.5% of box office profits, and reimbursement for their legal fees and the original $1.4 million dollar investment they put forth back in the 80’s for their own failed vision of Watchmen.  

The movie will release as scheduled on March 6th 2009, and we can all breathe a huge sigh of relief.

/End of Line

~ Darcy